Harry-Go-Round is Harry McCracken's personal blog. If you're looking for one just about tech, please check out Technologizer. Here I am in The New York Times. And for an excess of info about a lost 1930s cartoon character, visit Scrappyland.

Feed Me!


Put Harry-Go-Round in your favorite feed reader...
RSS
Google Reader or Homepage
Add to My Yahoo!
Subscribe with Bloglines
Add to netvibes

Robots Rave

robots.jpg

Here’s a link to a story from the new issue of Newsweek on Robots, which opens this weekend. It’s a good read from the standpoint of behind-the-scenes info on the film, but it also seems to say that the movie’s the best-looking CG feature ever made–and a great animated film, period. (It reaches back to Pinocchio to find something to compare it against.)

I like both William Joyce’s children’s books and Chris Wedge’s short films. For some reason, though, I’ve given Robots almost no thought at all–maybe because Blue Sky’s Ice Age didn’t particularly engage me–but now I’m looking forward to at least giving Robots a chance. It would be nice if a studio were to emerge as the other great CG production house besides Pixar (and I see no evidence that it’s going to be Dreamworks)…

2 comments to Robots Rave

  • Mark Mayerson

    There are two mixed-to-negative reviews of this film on Aint It Cool News. I saw the Fox half hour special last Friday about the film and did not come away with a strong feeling about the characters or the story.

    I did like Ice Age, more on the second viewing than the first, but I have a feeling that Robots is going to be a disappointment. It feels more like it’s been modelled on the DreamWorks approach than anything else and I’m expecting a shallow, glib movie that spritzes jokes at the audience without engaging the audience’s emotions. I hope that I’m wrong.

  • Mark Mayerson

    I wasn’t wrong.

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>